Most everyone in the litigation discovery profession would agree that oftentimes, the "smoking gun" is found in communication between two or more parties. The problem is that over 90% of electronic collections are email (or some other form of electronic communication). Add to that, emails can be forwarded, truncated, redirected to alternate parties, and recipient lists can change from one email to the next. All of this can easily create a confusing spider web of conversation chains, which only heightens the possibility that a key piece of communication could be missed.
With InterLegis' Correspondence Mapping technologies, legal teams can tap into multiple ways to uncover key communication threads ... while easily eliminating the "noise" (irrelevant communication threads). With it, users can:
With InterLegis' Correspondence Mapping technologies, legal teams can tap into multiple ways to uncover key communication threads ... while easily eliminating the "noise" (irrelevant communication threads). With it, users can:
